Parallel Session Topics
S1 The Nexus approach in the light of climate change adaptation and mitigation.
Conveners: Sergio Zelaya (UNCCD) and Stephan Hülsmann (UNU-FLORES)
Short description of the session |
The intricate inter-linkage of water and soil resources requires an integrated – thus a nexus approach for sustainable management. Also to be considered in such a nexus approach is waste, in particular for maintaining and improving soil fertility (organic matter, nutrients), ultimately enhancing food and water security, but also securing other essential ecosystem services and biodiversity. This is particularly true given the need to adapt to and mitigate the effects of climate change. Various technologies, policies, and management practices that aim to increase resilience and ensure food and water security (for example climate smart agriculture, conservation agriculture, IWRM, etc.) have been identified and comprehensive guidelines and best-practice examples are available. Still, loss of fertile soils and overexploitation of water resources continues to be a threat in many developing countries. Therefore, the issue of effectiveness of measures and/or of insufficient implementation and exploring what are the barriers to implementation and how can synergies of a nexus approach be unlocked, require special attention. |
Objectives and expected outcomes of the session |
The session aims to provide an update on current approaches to integrated resources management and climate adaptation and mitigation strategies. By providing examples from diverse regions and perspectives (water/soil/waste as well as science/implementation) it is intended to derive some general conclusions on what is needed to apply and adopt climate-adapted resource-use at scale, i.e. moving from pilot studies to large-scale implementation. |
Target group |
Decision makers and stakeholders from NGOs, farmer´s associations, water managers, academia etc. dealing with sustainable management of water, soil and waste and its implementation. |
Oral Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
WebGIS based simulation of water and nutrient fluxes in the Miyun catchment area as part of an integrated water resources management |
Micha Gebel1, Ralph Meißner2 and Jun Lu Bing3 |
1GALF bR; 2Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ); 3Beijing Soil and Water Conservation Center |
Aspects of Natural Resource Use and Adaptation to Climate Change in the Nigerian Savanna |
Felix Olorunfemi1, Mayowa Fasona2, Grace Oloukoi3, Peter Elias2 and Vide Adedayo2 |
1Nigerian Institute of Social and Economic Research; 2University of Lagos; 3Lead City University |
Prospects of feeding more people under changing conditions of climate, land use and water resources in the Central Rift Valley, Ethiopia |
Mezegebu Getnet, Martin K. van Ittersum, Huib Hengsdijk and Katrien Descheemaeker |
Wageningen University |
Global Change, Cattle Commodification and Pastoral Identity in the Horn of Africa |
Chanda Burrage |
Pennsylvania State University |
Tackling complexity in a changing climate: the water-energy-food nexus in low income countries |
Louise Karlberg |
Stockholm Environment Institute |
Poster Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Land, Climate and Resources Decision Support System – A Model Tool to Support the Nexus Approach |
Barbara Köstner |
TU Dresden |
Green infrastructure and ecosystem services to tackle climate change in Chilean cities |
Alexis Vásquez, Natalia Gómez, Dustyn Opazo, Christian Silva and Dayán Martín |
University of Chile |
Evaluation of Cassava-Based Systems for Adaptation to Climatic Variations in Eastern Nigeria |
Charles Asadu1, Simon Eze1 and Alfred Dixon2 |
1University of Nigeria; 2Internation Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) |
SUSTAINING CASSAVA FOOD SYSTEM IN SUBSAHARAN AFRICA FOR ENSURING FOOD SECURITY: SOIL FERTILITY STATUS AND CHALLENGES |
Charles Asadu1, Felix Nweke2 and Asadu Anthonia3 |
1University of Nigeria; 2IITA; 3UNN |
Varying characteristics and influencing factors of annual runoff in watershed |
Wenzhao Liu1 and Lulu Zhang2 |
1Northwest A&F University; 2UNU-FLORES |
Nexus approach and perspective for sustainable land (soil, water and food) management under changing climate in Tunisia |
Badia Chulli |
Water Researches and Technologies Center, Tunisia |
S2A The governance of climate adaptation: comparing experiences of diverse regions and sectors.
Conveners: Joanne Vinke-De Kruijf (University of Osnabrück) and Gül Özerol, Cheryl de Boer (University of Twente)
Short description of the session |
As the evidence of climate change grows, public and private actors increasingly recognize that – even when mitigation efforts prove to be successful – adaptation measures are needed. While the projected impacts and effects of climate change differ from region to region and from sector to sector, early and integrated actions are expected to be beneficial in any case. To actually implement such actions can be challenging as it requires coordinated efforts of various actors. This session invites contributions that address the governance trade-offs and challenges that arise when adapting to climate in practice. We particularly invite studies that compare empirical evidence of diverse regions and/or sectors. Key questions to be addressed include: What aspects and which actors should be included when adapting to climate change? How to achieve productive interactions between a wide range of actors (including international and supranational organizations, national, regional and local government authorities, businesses and non-governmental organizations) and sectors (e.g. water, agriculture, environment and energy)? How to develop strong, but flexible and integrative governance structures that can support climate adaptation? What can diverse regions and sectors learn from each other regarding the governance of climate adaptation? |
Objectives and expected outcomes of the session |
This session’s objective is to develop a better understanding of the governance challenges that are associated with climate adaptation in various contexts. By comparing the experiences of diverse regions and sectors, we aim to reach an insightful overview of the governance challenges that are associated with climate adaptation and to generate insights into the governance of climate adaptation. |
Target group |
Researchers, practitioners and policy makers who have an interest in the governance of climate change. |
Oral Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
The role of ecosystem services in climate adaptation management |
Kathrin Knüppe |
University of Osnabrück |
Adapting Institutions. Institutional Economics and Segregative vs. Integrative Climate Adaptation |
Andreas Thiel and Matteo Roggero |
Humboldt University Berlin |
Governance assessment of drought adaptation in Northwest Europe: A regional comparative study |
Gül Ozerol1, Joanne Vinke-De Kruijf2, Cheryl de Boer1, Alison Browne3, Isabelle La Jeunesse4, Hans Bressers1 and Rodrigo Vidaurre5 |
1University of Twente; 2University of Osnabrück; 3University of Manchester; 4Université de Tours; 5Ecologic Institute |
Beyond migration-as-adaptation: Governance challenges of temporal and circular migration schemes as a response to climate change |
Ethemcan Turhan |
Istanbul Policy Center, Sabancı University |
Poster Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Neglecting climate adaptation under the umbrella of non-adaptive water governance: The story of transition from Qanat to pumped wells in Rafsanjan, Iran |
Seyed Jalaleddin Mirnezami1, Ali Bagheri1, Cheryl de Boer2 and Mohammad Abdollahi Ezatabadi3 |
1Tarbiat Modares University; 2University of Twente; 3Pistachio Research Institute |
Interactive governance of urban flooding in Metro Manila |
Lisa Roodenburg |
University of Amsterdam |
S2B Climate adaptation from a bottom-up perspective: stakeholder involvement, perspectives and knowledge.
Conveners: Joanne Vinke-De Kruijf (University of Osnabrück) and Gül Özerol, Cheryl de Boer (University of Twente)
Short description of the session |
Climate adaptation is increasingly on the agenda of national governments, supranational institutions, international organizations and multi-nationals. The consequences of climate change are, however, ultimately experienced at the regional and the local level. As consequences will differ based on the specific context of the locality, contextually appropriate adaptation actions at the regional and the local level should be encouraged. This session focuses on the different experiences and theories regarding climate adaptation at the level of and in collaboration with local communities and stakeholders, whilst recognizing the role of community-specific circumstances. Key questions that we would like to focus on are: Who are the key stakeholders at the local and the regional level? To what extent are these stakeholders aware of climate change and what do they know? How to improve local knowledge and awareness on climate change? How to best integrate the interests, perspectives and knowledge of local and regional stakeholders in adaptation processes? In addition, we look forward reflecting upon the following questions about multi-level governance and policy transfer: How to best align and connect local and regional perspectives and knowledge with governance processes at the higher level? To what extent would the studied approach or solution to adaptation be transferable to other localities? |
Objectives and expected outcomes of the session |
This session focuses on climate adaptation at the local and the regional level. By reflecting on the features of the diverse knowledge and perspectives of these stakeholders and on experiences with stakeholder involvement and community-based approaches, this session aims at developing a better understanding of stakeholder processes and interactions in climate adaptation processes. How these processes align and interact with governance processes taking place at other levels is also a relevant aspect that will be highlighted during the session. |
Target group |
Researchers, practitioners and policy makers who are interested and/or involved in climate adaptation at the local or the regional level. |
Oral Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Environmental Change and Adaptation Capacities of River Basin Organizations in Southern Africa |
Sabine Schulze |
University of Leipzig |
Comparing, explaining and changing perception of climate risk and adaptive behavior in the global South and North |
John Appah1 and Gregor Vulturius2 |
1WASCAL; 2Stockholm Environment Institute |
Local strategies to cope with climate change: Experiences from the Andean regions in Bolivia and Peru and knowledge transfer to East Africa. |
Jürgen Pretzsch, André Lindner, Maxi Domke, Francois Jost and Marolyn Vidaurre |
TU Dresden |
Governance in support of Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation: Insights from four hazard-prone regions |
Caroline van Bers1 and Matt Hare2 |
1The Integrated Assessment Society; 2UNAM, Mexico |
Poster Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Climate Change Who Knows? A comparison of Students and Workers in Nigeria. |
Oluwakemi Okuwa |
Nigerian Institute of Social and Economic Research |
Paradigm Shift in the Irrigation Water Management in a Changing Climate |
Sara Lotfi and Shahab Araghinejad |
University of Tehran |
Key stakeholders of climate change and disaster risk management: the example of flood risk management in the city of Accra, Ghana |
Raphael Ane Atanga and Jochen Schanze |
Dresden Leibniz Graduate School; TU Dresden |
S3 What information on climate change do we need to manage the resources of water, soil and waste?
Conveners: Christian Bernhofer (TU Dresden) and Janez Susnik (UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education)
Short description of the session |
The session asks for contributions on the proper climate information helping to manage water, soil and waste with special emphasis on the nexus of the three resources. Climate and climate change are often treated by global or large scale numbers but for impact assessment regional scale and relevant statistics including extremes are needed. Therefore, we will address the following aspects with relevance for the nexus: (i) availability of climate information from station data and remote sensing, (ii) modelling approaches to improve today's climate data, (iii) regional climate modelling and evaluation tools, (iv) climate change information from model output at regional scale including variability and extremes, and (v) examples of the use of climate information for the management of the nexus of water, soil and waste.
As the three resources are coupled, a joint and NEXUS specific treatment is necessary also for the required climate information. Extreme events might trigger long-lasting consequences of meteorological events, like heavy rain causing erosion or leakage of a landfill. Droughts from lack of rainfall might reduce vegetation cover permanently, with consequences for the quality of the soil and groundwater status. Such nexus issues should be addressed from a need for climate information point of view. |
Oral Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Effects of climate change parameters on land-use landcover changes in the central region of Kenya |
Mercy Mwaniki and Matthias Moeller |
Beuth Hochschule fuer Technik Berlin |
Water, energy, food modelling for long-term resource analysis: a demonstration of concept |
Janez Susnik |
UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education |
Assessment of representative climate change projections for hydrological impact studies in Distrito Federal, Brazil |
Pablo Borges, Barfus Klemens and Bernhofer Christian |
TU Dresden |
Bringing multidisciplinarity in climate change impact assessment: an example in agriculture |
Francois Delobel and Oscar Rojas |
FAO |
An integrated regional climate change impact assessment and evaluation methodology considering multiple resources and their usability |
Jochen Schanze, Axel Sauer and Marco Neubert |
Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development (IOER) |
The Global Land Project with an Emphasis on the Amazon |
Fabiano Micheletto Scarpa and Sebastien Boillat |
National Institute for Space Research (INPE), Brazil |
Poster Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Climate Change Projections and Impacts in the West Bank, Palestine |
Hadeel Qasim Sulaiman1, Wafa' Hamdan1, Mohammad Almasri1 and Fathi Anayah2 |
1An-Najah National University; 2Palestine Technical University |
How do the frequency and severity of flooding affect the livelihoods of farmers in the context of climate change? |
Alice Bonou |
WASCAL |
Comparative analysis of urban climate in Chile, and its relationship with selected geographic and urban factors |
Pamela Smith1, Hugo Romero1, Alexis Vásquez1, Dustyn Opazo1 and Cristian Henríquez2 |
1Universidad de Chile; 2Universidad Catolica |
Long flood time series from geoarchives: evidences from lake and reservoir sediments |
Lucas Kämpf1, Achim Brauer2, Markus Czymzik3, Tina Swierczynski2, Frank Jacob1 and Karl-Heinz Feger1 |
1TU Dresden; 2German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ); 3Lund University |
Shifting seasonality of precipitation extremes in Saxony |
Andrea S. Schaller, Johannes Franke, Thomas Pluntke and Christian Bernhofer |
TU Dresden |
Comprehensive observations of precipitation by means of radar - chances and challenges: A climatological case study for Saxony, Germany |
Rico Kronenberg |
TU Dresden |
Smart environmental monitoring using low-cost sensor networks |
Pierre Karrasch, Daniel Kadner, Matthias Müller and Lars Bernard |
TU Dresden |
Impacts of Climate Change on Stormwater System in Al Hillah City-IRAQ and Suggestions for the Decision Makers |
Firas Aljanabi, Christian Bernhofer and Peter Krebs |
TU Dresden |
Separating the effects of changes in land cover and climate on water resources: a hydro-meteorological analysis for Saxony, Germany |
Maik Renner1, Kristina Brust2, Kai Schwärzel3, Martin Volk4 and Christian Bernhofer2 |
1Max-Planck-Institute; 2TU Dresden; 3UNU-Flores; 4Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) |
Soil hydrological properties of a tropical basin: case of the Beninese basin of Niger River (West Africa) |
Djigbo Felicien Badou1, Bernd Diekkrüger2, Abel Afouda1 and Evison Kapangaziwiri3 |
1WASCAL; 2University of Bonn; 3CSIR |
S4 Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development for resource efficient industries.
Convener: Jerome Stucki (United Nations Industrial Development Organization - UNIDO)
Short description of the session |
Industrial growth is needed in developing and emerging economies to alleviate poverty, deliver goods and services, create jobs, and raise living standards. However industries are also large-scale emitters of greenhouse gasses, toxic wastes, and leading consumers of energy, water and raw materials. Therefore the manufacturing sector is of critical importance to achieve a decoupling of economic growth from unsustainable resource use and negative environmental impacts. This session will present experiences in applying a nexus approach in industries and through policies. It will hence raise awareness on the role industries can play in reducing the impact of climate change. |
Objectives and expected outcomes of the session |
The objective of this session is to raise awareness on the challenges faced by policy makers and industries in mitigating and adapting to climate change while ensuring economic growth. While Climate Change challenges are often complex and interlinked, thus the need for nexus approaches, the session will demonstrate case studies and best practices offering solutions for policy makers and practitioners. |
Target group |
Policy makers, practitioners and researchers who have an interest in climate change mitigation and adaptation by applying resource efficient approaches. |
Oral Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Green Industry approach to support inclusive and sustainable industry |
Heinz Leuenberger |
UNIDO |
Spatial assessment of soil contamination from Informal e-waste recycling site in Agbogbloshie, Ghana |
Vincent Kyere1 and Klaus Greve2 |
1Centre for Development Research (ZEF); 2University of Bonn |
Adaptation to climate change of companies - Experiences from the Dresden region |
Julian Meyr and Edeletraud Günther |
TU Dresden |
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Climate Change and Its Impact on Cooling in Power Plants |
Charlotte Newiadomsky and Ingela Tietze |
SWK-Energiezentrum E² der Hochschule Niederrhein |
Mitigation policies in oil-rich jurisdictions, The case of renewables for Alberta- Canada |
Hamed Beheshti |
Environmental Policy Research Center, FU Berlin |
S5 Sustainable energy solutions under conditions of climate change.
Conveners: Richard Taylor (International Hydropower Association), Phuong Nam Nguyen (Vietnam Center for Technology Responding to Climate Change - CliTech) and Stephan Hülsmann (UNU-FLORES)
Short description of the session |
The advancement of renewable energy is a cornerstone of global efforts to reduce greenhouse gases and address climate change. This session will explore solutions to climate-related challenges for renewable energies in the developing world. The special roles played by hydropower, biogas, and biofuels will be highlighted, focusing on integrated management strategies to mitigate effects of climate change. Hydropower has a special role among renewable energy sources as a means of energy storage, but a changing climate poses unique challenges to existing and future assets, due to possible water scarcity and flood risk. Biogas has been accepted widely in Europe and North America, but it is yet to transfer to developing countries because of barriers such as a lack of technology, despite high potentials in many regions. Bio-fuels are another source of renewable energy, requiring soil and water resources. Water is needed to grow and process bio-fuels, but also to facilitate energy production from other sources, both renewable and non-renewable. A sustainable solution must thus consider energy in an integrated manner with soil and water management: the nexus approach. |
Objectives and expected outcomes of the session |
The session aims at providing an up-to-date overview on sustainable energy solutions under impacts of climate change. Case studies from various regions will show how specific challenges can be addressed from a nexus perspective. |
Target group |
Academia, practitioners and policy-makers working for integrated solutions for energy, water and food security and climate change resilience/ response. |
Oral Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Energy in Iceland: Adaptation to Climate Change |
Oli Sveinsson |
Landsvirkjun, Iceland |
Hydropower and climate change: Mitigating climate change and resilience in the face of uncertainty |
Tracy Lane |
International Hydropower Association |
A sector modelling approach for Ethiopia's long run investment on energy resource use option: economic and energy supply security implication |
Dawit Guta and Jan Börner |
Center for Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn |
Climate change induced carbon competition: bioenergy versus soil organic matter reproduction - an indicator based assessment |
Uwe Franko, Felix Witing, Greta Jäckel and Martin Volk |
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) |
Energy and food security: Role of energy models for policy planning |
Alam Mondal and Claudia Ringler |
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) |
Poster Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Automation and Control of Biogas plants based on Linux and Open Source Software |
Christian Etzkorn |
Awite Bioenergie GmbH |
Leveraging Changes in Climate and Water-Food Security-Energy Nexus for Sustainability in Agricultural Transformation System: A Case Study of Nigeria |
Obayelu, Abiodun Elijah |
Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria |
Renewable energy from biogas in Vietnam: Potential and Challenges for Climate Change Mitigation |
Nguyen Phuong Nam1, Vu Anh Minh2 |
1Center for Technology Responding to Climate Change; 2Vucon Renewable Agency |
Day 2: Urbanization
S6A Eco-cities – Urban environmental development and the NEXUS approach.
Conveners: Bernhard Mueller (Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development - IOER) and Simon Joss (University of Westminster, Leverhulme International Network on Eco-cities)
Short description of the session |
Eco-cities are becoming increasingly popular worldwide. Starting from ideas, which were developed in the 1970s and 1980s, more and more cities have established ‘showcases’ of how to foster urban development in a more sustainable way. Eco-cities have moved from a relatively loosely defined concept with only few, mainly experimental pilots to a multitude of concrete practice led initiatives. Whereas until 2000 less than 30 eco-city initiatives were identifiable, their number has skyrocketed since then to almost 200 by now. Between 1990 and 2013, ten Eco-city World Summits have taken place. Eco-cities variously promote integrated concepts towards urban planning and environmentally friendly development, and they may constitute a local basis for the implementation of the UN SDGs. Within the framework of integrated sustainable development, the NEXUS approach plays a crucial role. Against this background, the session will focus on the following questions:
|
Objectives and expected outcomes of the session |
Guided by these questions and taking eco-cities/sustainable cities as examples, the session has the following objectives:
|
Oral Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Introduction: Eco-cities and the Nexus approach |
Simon Joss and Bernhard Müller |
|
Bogota towards a sustainable and inclusive city |
Gerardo Ardila |
Secretaría Distrital de Planeación de Bogotá |
The resource-sensitive city of the 21st Century |
Janez Susnik1, Michael Hammond1, Christopher Hutton2, David Grey3 and Dragan Savic3 |
1UNESCO-IHE; 2University of Bristol; 3University of Exter |
Building Eco-town Framework in the Municipality of San Vicente, Philippines |
Hoon Chang and Heon Seok Yoo | Korea Environment Institute |
Smart urban planning – Implementing environmental development into urban realities |
Stefanie Rößler, Bernhard Müller and Clemens Deilmann |
Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development |
Poster Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Spatial Expansion in Tabriz City and Destruction of Ecological Resource |
Akbar Rahimi |
University of Tabriz |
A comparative study on the eco-city practices in Ma’anshan and Freiburg |
Xiaoping Xie, Hendrik Herold and Wei Hou |
Leibniz Institute of Ecological and Regional Development |
Walking the Tightrope: The Challenge of Sustainability for the City of Isfahan |
Ehsan Tavakoli-Nabavi |
Australian National University |
OWERRI MUNICIPALITY, NIGERIA; AN ECO-MUNICIPALITY OR A MERE RAIN-MUNICIPALITY |
Emmanuella Onyenechere |
Imo State University |
The Low Carbon Development Strategy of the Great Metropolitan Area of San José, Costa Rica |
Mauricio Zaballa Romero1, Huberth Mendez2, Manuel Salas2 and Irene Campos3 |
1UNEP DTU Partnership; 2FUDEU; 3Instituto Costarricense del Cemento y del Concreto |
Policy recommendations for the solid waste management in Kazakhstan |
Zhanna Kapsalyamova1 and Artem Korzhenevych2 |
1ERI; 2Leibniz Institute of Ecological and Regional Development |
S6B Eco-cities – Urban environmental development and the NEXUS approach.
Conveners: Bernhard Mueller (Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development - IOER) and Simon Joss (University of Westminster, Leverhulme International Network on Eco-cities)
Short description of the session |
Eco-cities are becoming increasingly popular worldwide. Starting from ideas, which were developed in the 1970s and 1980s, more and more cities have established ‘showcases’ of how to foster urban development in a more sustainable way. Eco-cities have moved from a relatively loosely defined concept with only few, mainly experimental pilots to a multitude of concrete practice led initiatives. Whereas until 2000 less than 30 eco-city initiatives were identifiable, their number has skyrocketed since then to almost 200 by now. Between 1990 and 2013, ten Eco-city World Summits have taken place. Eco-cities variously promote integrated concepts towards urban planning and environmentally friendly development, and they may constitute a local basis for the implementation of the UN SDGs. Within the framework of integrated sustainable development, the NEXUS approach plays a crucial role. Against this background, the session will focus on the following questions:
|
Objectives and expected outcomes of the session |
Guided by these questions and taking eco-cities/sustainable cities as examples, the session has the following objectives:
|
Oral Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Indicator based assessment of sustainability of ecosystems of eco-cities – general approaches and the example study Solar-City Linz-Pichling, Austria |
Jürgen Breuste |
Paris-Lodron University Salzburg |
Land recycling: beyond land use impacts |
Geertrui Louwagie1, Jordi Boronat2 and Rastislav Stanik1 |
1European Environment Agency; 2MediTerra |
Data Envelopment Analysis - A Heuristic Tool to detect Eological and Economic Efficiency |
Clemens Deilmann, Iris Lehmann and Daniel Reissmann |
Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development |
Resilience Engineering and Policy Transfer: Enschede's Green Roof Policy Process |
Cheryl de Boer and Mirjana Jovanovic | University of Twente |
Conclusions |
Simon Joss and Bernhard Müller |
S7 Urban ecosystem services and biological diversity.
Conveners: Matthias Herbert (Federal Nature Conservation Agency - BfN), Wolfgang Wende, Juliane Mathey, Andreas Otto (Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development - IOER), Luis Inostroza (TU Dresden), Jürgen Breuste, Martina Artmann (University Salzburg), Christine Fürst (Center for Development Research - ZEF) and Marcin Spyra (Opole University of Technology)
Short description of the session |
Urban systems are known to be the areas with greatest conflicts on land resources and services requested by a multitude of different actors. Particularly, in densely settled metropolitan areas, requests for a sustainable development and restoration of closer to nature structures and extensively used land are increasing. E.g. urban green systems as expression of a nexus between urban biodiversity, and urban ecosystem services concerning water, soil and built up structures are assigned a crucial role in influencing the quality of life of urban population. A request for socio-culturally and ecologically efficient development and restoration strategies is building common visions and a common value understanding that incorporates knowledge, expectations and experiences of variable stakeholders. The concept of ecosystem services and, additionally, the concept of biodiversity provide a great potential to particularly support development and restoration processes in urban contexts. This can be achieved by raising the awareness about nature’s contribution to human well-being. Also, the concepts provide a base towards the development of more community-based and increasingly participatory governance schemes in urban planning and development. |
Objectives and expected outcomes of the session |
With this symposium we intend to explore –based on international case studies– the nexus potentials of the ecosystem services and biodiversity concept in urban planning. Guiding principles will be delivered for a sustainable development of the rural-urban fringe, for the development of greening strategies, and for the restoration of services providing areas in densely settled environments. We will discuss the implications of introducing the ecosystem services and biodiversity concept for typical governance schemes in urban planning and development. |
Target group |
The session addresses, first of all, the nature conservation and biodiversity policy level which means decision-makers from international high ranked administrations and political institutions. It also focuses on urban local and regional decision makers and practitioners from around the world. Additionally, the science level is addressed as the ecosystem services approach is highly discussed within the landscape ecology, biology, geography and spatial planning scientific community. With this, the session establishes a science policy interface, thus also a kind of science-policy nexus. |
Oral Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Multifunctional Green Infrastructure as a Planning Strategy for Territorial Cohesion in Santiago de Chile |
Alexis Vásquez, Francisca Morales, Josefa Vergara, Andrés Riveros and Benjamín Ludeña |
University of Chile |
A land cover-based ecosystem services approach – a concept for integrated water and environmental resources management and sustainable urban development in Beira, Mozambique |
António Dos Anjos Luís1, Sérgio Niquisse2, Dennis Eucker2, Mari Ito3, Wolfgang Wende4, Karsten Grunewald4, Ralf-Uwe Syrbe4, Ulrich Walz4 and Samuel Kusangaya5 |
1UCM-CIG; 2UCM; 3UNU-FLORES; 4IOER; 5University of Kwazulu-Natal |
Ecosystem services and biological diversity in urban areas - challenges from the perspective of nature conservation |
Matthias Herbert and Alice Schröder |
Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Germany |
Indicators for Cultural Ecosystem Services in urban contexts: a critical review for urban planning |
Luis Inostroza1, Daniele La Rosa2 and Marcin Spyra3 |
1TU Dresden; 2University Catania; 3Opole Polytechnic |
Assessment of Ecosystem Services for Urban Resilience in Singapore |
Jeannette Sieber and Manon Pons | European Institute for Energy Research (EIFER) |
Poster Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Temperature mitigation in residential areas by urban green spaces |
Madhumitha Jaganmohan, Sonja Knapp, Carsten Buchmann and Nina Schwarz |
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) |
Ecosystem Services outside of Urban Green Areas? |
Carola Meß and Harald Zepp |
Ruhr-Universität Bochum |
Assessment of Ecosystem Services for Urban Resilience in Singapore |
Jeannette Sieber and Manon Pons |
European Institute for Energy Research (EIFER) |
Ecosystem services and spatial biodiversity through informed land use planning |
Siegmar Thomas |
TU Dresden |
Green infrastructure and ecosystem services to tackle climate change in Chilean cities |
Alexis Vásquez, Natalia Gómez, Dustyn Opazo, Christian Silva and Dayán Martín |
University of Chile |
Advancing Performance Of Green Technologies For Remediation And Reclamation Of Degraded Urban Soils |
Magdalena Sut, Katja Boldt-Burisch, Ina Pohle and Thomas Raab |
Brandenburgische Technische Universität Cottbus-Senftenberg |
S8 The Nexus Approach to Integrated Urban Water Management.
Conveners: Sarantuyaa Zandaryaa (International Hydrological Programme, UNESCO-IHP) and Björn Helm (TU Dresden)
Short description of the session |
One of the major challenges of the 21st century is to provide safe drinking water and basic sanitation for all. As the world’s population has become predominantly urban, meeting the growing demand for good quality water for the increasing urban populations is a serious concern for cities around the world. Due to rapid population growth and urbanization, an increasing number of cities are facing acute water problems both in terms of quantity and quality, as well as in coping with impacts of more frequent floods and droughts. Urban water problems are multiple and complex, such as the lack of access to safe drinking water and sanitation, poor wastewater management, the need for expanding and upgrading water supply and sewerage infrastructure, pollution of urban water resources and aquatic ecosystems, and inadequate capacity of urban water systems to adapt to climate change impacts. Integrated urban water management (IUWM) aims to incorporate all these components of water management in urban areas into an integrated system, taking into consideration hydrological, environmental, socioeconomic and institutional aspects of water resources management. Consequently, the IUWM provides the opportunity to optimize the whole urban water system and to minimize water consumption, costs and energy. However, a much deeper understanding of the interfaces and interconnections between the different resources streams in cities is required to improve IUWM. In particular the water–waste–energy nexus in urban areas will be a key for sustainable management of water and other resources in cities. |
Objectives and expected outcomes of the session |
The session focuses on the nexus approach to improve urban water management, with particular emphasis on the water-waste-energy nexus. The session discussions will explore the following questions: • How to optimize integrated urban water management through the water-waste-energy nexus approach? • What are concrete examples of integrated resources management such as water, waste and energy in an urban context? • How to “integrate” the different aspects of resources management in urban areas in a holistic framework?
The session will include discussions on the conceptual framework as well as presentations on concrete case-studies (carried out by TU Dresden and other research institutions). The session will also aim to draw key messages and recommendations for sustainable and more effective use of water and other resources in urban areas by optimizing the resources’ use through the nexus approach. |
Oral Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Opening (5 min) |
||
Integrated urban water management towards increased water security in cities (a short presentation) |
Sarantuyaa Zandaryaa |
UNESCO-IHP |
Main presentations (15 min) |
||
It’s about sanitation not sewers – The future of urban water management |
Max Maurer |
Eawag |
SEMIZENTRAL – Opening of the first semizentralized Supply and Treatment Center in Qingdao |
Peter Cornel, Susanne Bieker and Johanna Tolksdorf |
TU Darmstadt |
The Climate Change impacts on the Highland cities of La Paz and El Alto and the climate change policies strategies to cope with the potential water scarcity |
Mauricio Zaballa Romero1, María Renee Pinto Romero2 and Margot Franken3 |
1UNEP DTU Partnership; 2Autoridad Plurinacional de la Madre Tierra; 3Fundación SIMBIOSIS |
Short case presentations (5 min) |
||
SMART WATER GRID or New Orleans fresh water NEXUS |
Jorg Sieweke |
University of Virginia |
Impact of poor urban stream management practices on flood risk |
Angeliki Mentzafou and Elias Dimitriou |
HCMR-Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters, Greece |
Water and Energy Nexus in Bangalore city and possible solution of water supply |
Reba Paul1 and Gautam Joshii2 |
1University of Queensland; 2Individual Consultant |
Poster Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Supporting decisions in water management by exploring information and capacity gaps – Transferring experiences from an IWRM study to the Nexus approach |
Marco Leidel1 and Frank Blumensaat2 |
1TU Dresden; 2Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zürich (ETH) |
Potential impacts of urban area expansion on water budget and groundwater level in the Gaza Strip: an integrated modeling framework |
Tamer Eshtawi1, Mariele Evers2 and Bernhard Tischbein1 |
1Center for development research (ZEF); 2Bonn University |
Towards sustainable sanitation solutions in small settlements in Central and Eastern Europe |
Tjasa Griessler Bulc1, Richard Muller2 and Darja Istenic2 |
1University of Ljubljana; 2Global Water Partnership |
Planning Integrated Urban Water Management and River Restoration. Case study in Tepic Nayarit, Mexico. |
Mauro Lafratta1, Gabriela Espinosa Gutiérrez2, Massimiliano Fabbricino1 and Ralf Otterpohl2 |
1University of Naples; 2Hamburg University of Technology |
Integrating the nexus: Challenges of water governance in the context of urban-rural-interface |
Nadin Gaasch, Thomas Weith and Annegret Repp |
Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) |
DECENTRALIZED WASTEWATER REUSE TO ADDRESS WATER ENERGY FOOD NEXUS USING GIS IN LEH TOWN, LADAKH, INDIA |
Daphne Gondhalekar |
Technical University Munich |
S9 Urbanization as an opportunity: Local solutions and urban/peri-urban interlinkages for integrated resource-efficiency in metropolitan regions.
Conveners: Carmen Vogt, Jan Schlenk (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit - GIZ), Jens Liebe, Daniel Tsegai (UN-Water Decade Programme on Capacity Development, UNW-DPC) and Mathew Kurian (UNU-FLORES)
Short description of the session |
Population growth and urbanization are major global trends which will have great impacts on available resources. Between 2011 and 2050, the world population is expected to increase from 7.0 to 9.3 billion, while at the same time, the population living in urban areas is projected to grow from 3.6 billion (51%) in 2011 to 6.3 billion (67%) in 2050. Most of the population growth expected in urban areas will be concentrated in the cities and towns of the less developed regions (UN 2012). While the urban population is said to double, urban land consumption is projected to triple: urban growth is mainly to take place in peri-urban and surrounding rural areas of today’s secondary and tertiary cities. Urbanization and globalization intensify the linkage between cities and their surrounding areas – in this so called “Urban Century”. Rapid urban growth is accompanied by a dramatic rise in the exploitation of land and resources. Rural areas depend on urban markets for income, while cities rely on agriculture for their food supply. The efficient, cross-sectoral resource management of peri-urban areas is hence, a direct contribution to sustainable urban development processes. The supply of these growing urban areas with water, energy and food, as well as the management of the waste they produce will lead to great challenges. Yet, this concentration of population in urban areas also provides large potentials and opportunities to improve resource efficiency, reuse, and recycling. To solve resource challenges associated with urbanization through the nexus approach, the institutionalization of nexus thinking is indispensable, and requires supportive frameworks from the national level to the municipalities, greater awareness and strong, interconnected institutions. This is by no means a small task and requires, besides technical solutions and the transfer of smart technologies, the capacity of various stakeholders and actors from diverse sectors and governance levels to move away from isolated approaches and sectoral thinking towards more horizontally and vertically integrated concepts of resource management. The session highlights the importance of integrated Nexus approaches in dealing with rural-urban linkages in the context of metropolitan regions. The panel includes inputs from different perspectives, providing findings and experiences of how to incorporate the different Nexus concepts in a peri-urban governance setting, thereby drawing conclusions from the local level to inspire the Global / Post-2015-Agenda. |
Objectives and expected outcomes of the session |
Based upon the evaluation of implemented pilot experiences in developing and emerging countries the expected outcomes of the session are as follows: - Guidance Evidence on how the NEXUS approach contributes to sustainably governing urbanization - Discussion on how to bridge the urban rural divide - Discussion of potentials and opportunities in cities to improve resource efficiency, reuse, and recycling - Discussion of capacity needs to institutionalize integrated resource management and the nexus thinking - Insights into the contribution of cities and metropolitan areas towards contributing to the global development agenda achieving the potential targets of the post-2015-agenda - Evidence on a NEXUS approach contributing to the resource-efficient, healthy and sustainable development of metropolitan regions. |
Target group |
- researchers - policy-makers - national/local government representatives - urban planners, service providers, utility managers - water and waste management practitioners - other stakeholders (agriculture and energy sectors) |
Oral Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Operationalizing the Urban NEXUS in Cities and Metropolitan Regions |
Carmen Vogt, Alexandra Linden and Jan Schlenk |
GIZ |
More people, more problems? How can capacity development help to capitalize on the nexus opportunities in urban and peri-urban areas? |
Jens Liebe1, Daniel Tsegai1 and Reza Ardakanian2 |
1UNW-DPC; 2UNU-FLORES |
Pro-urban water allocation - case study of Vu Gia - Thu Bon river basin |
Viet Ha Nguyen |
University of Bonn |
Operationalizing the Urban NEXUS approach: the City of Nashik optimizing water, energy and land resources in peri-urban agriculture |
Jeb Brugmann1, Kathrine Brekke2 and Ritu Thakur2 |
1The Next Practice; 2ICLEI |
Sustainable Sanitation at the centre of Water-Energy-Food Nexus |
Kim Andersson1, Patrick Bracken2, Arne Panesar2 and Rahul Ingle2 |
1Stockholm Environment Institute; 2GIZ |
Nexus planning approaches and instruments |
Mathew Kurian1, Mario Suardi2 and Kristin Meyer1 |
1UNU-FLORES; 2The World Bank |
Poster Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Challenges of equity in a rapidly urbanizing Africa: An ecosystem services perspective |
Blal Adem Esmail and Davide Geneletti |
University of Trento |
S10 Data Harmonization & Evidence based Decision Making in Peri-urban Regions.
Conveners: Graham Alabaster (United Nations Human Settlements Programme - UN-Habitat), Pham Ngoc Bao & Bijon Mitra (Institute for Global Environmental Strategies - IGES)
Short description of the session |
Data plays a critical role as a basis for evidence based decision-making. Yet availability of reliable data is a serious concern in developing countries. For management of environmental resources such as water that are characterized by both flow and stock, the availability of point and non-point data is crucial. The inability to collect and analyze continuous data covering differing temporal scales (day, month, year), dis-aggregated by users and potentially with multiple uses can result in fragmented decision-making processes. |
Objectives and expected outcomes of the session |
1) The objective of this session is to discuss some of the reasons for fragmented decision-making and their implications for design, implementation and evaluation of research projects. 2) Recapture the state of accessibility to reliable and meaningful data in developing countries 2) Identify the actions to solve the existing problems related to data availability and accessibility so that nexus approach to resource management can be promoted in decision-making. 3) Developing approaches for nexus monitoring in the post 2015 development agenda. 4) Identify key models for building capacity and engaging member states |
Target group |
- researchers - policy-makers - urban planners - water and waste management practitioners - other stakeholders (agriculture and energy sectors) |
Oral Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Concept for a Multi-scale Ecosystem and Resource Informatics for Terrestrial Sustainability |
Uta Heiden1, Derek Rogge1, Christian Fischer1, Andreas Mueller1 and Fatima Ferraz2 |
1DLR Oberpfaffenhofen; 2FADO |
Water energy nexus approach: Toward harmonization of water and energy in sustainable resource management – Case of India |
Bijon Kumer Mitra and Anindya Bhattacharya |
Institute for Global Environmental Strategies |
Point source water quality monitoring strategies and management in Korea |
Eulsaeng Cho |
Korea Environment Institute |
Feasibility of protection zones for water resources in arid areas: Case study – Ein-Sultan Spring, Jericho, Palestine |
Marwan Ghanem and Mahmoud Hamad |
Birzeit University |
Multi-component web-based decision support for management of water resources |
Catalin Stefan |
TU Dresden |
Using Earth observations, novel data and data integration to monitor progress toward the UN SDG for Water |
1Graham Alabaster, 1Rifat Hossain |
1UN-Habitat, 2WHO and Earth Observations Task Force |
Poster Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Multi-criteria analysis approach of adaptation actions in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania |
Nathalie Jean-Baptiste1, Oliver Gebhardt1, Volker Meyer1 and Stelios Grafakos2 |
1Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ); 2Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies |
Multi-component web-based decision support system for management of water resources |
Catalin Stefan, Aybulat Fatkhutdinov, Jana Sallwey, Jana Ringelb, Thomas Fichtner, Jinxing Guo and Peter-Wolfgang Gräber |
TU Dresden |
S11 UNU-FLORES Nexus Monitoring Strategies & Management of Environmental Resources.
Conveners: Mathew Kurian (UNU-FLORES) and Neelima Thota (Arghyam Foundation)
Short description of the session |
There are numerous data sets available worldwide on different aspects of environmental resources (examples include forest cover, rainfall or soil erosion rates). From academic sources there are a number of data sets available that can potentially define principles that promote integrated management of environmental resources. The serious problem is not the lack of data itself but the inability of the research process to provide a context to results of field trials and controlled experiments. This challenge lies at the heart of the science-policy divide; fragmented decision- making processes in developing countries is less a result of poor science and more a result of a poor understanding of the policy process. Therefore for us to understand the basis for robust regimes for management of environmental resources a substantive understanding of the services that are provided by stewardship of forests, water or soil resources is essential. |
Objectives and expected outcomes of the session |
Session objectives and expected outcomes: This session will bring together members of the Africa regional consortium on drought risk monitoring and Asian partners to share tentative results of the nexus observatory network. The discussion will attempt to identify links between resources, services and risks covering irrigation, water supply and livestock sectors.
Expected Outcomes include: 1. Feedback on commissioned studies on the water- soil nexus in Africa 2. Engagement of policy makers involved in discussions on a post- 2015 monitoring framework- indicators, tools, approaches 3. Feedback on conceptualization of proposed Asia nexus observatory network on water- wastewater nexus 4. Developing approaches for nexus monitoring in the post 2015 development agenda 5. Identify key models for building capacity and engaging member states |
Target group |
- researchers - policy-makers - urban planners - water and waste management practitioners - other stakeholders (agriculture and energy sectors) |
Oral Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
The Soil Leadership Academy approach to support LDN objective |
Alexandru Marchis | UNCCD |
Water Point Mapping as a Drought Risk Monitoring Tool for Irrigation |
Sandram Maweru and Thanasius Sitolo |
Ministry of Agriculture Irrigation and Water Development, Malawi |
Water Point Mapping as a Drought Risk Monitoring Tool for Irrigation |
Abraha Adugna Ashenaafi | Water Resources Bureau, Ethiopia |
Towards Water Security – Addressing the Groundwater and Sanitation |
Neelima Thota and Gayathri Lalu | Arghyam Foundation, India |
How can capacity development help to capitalize on the nexus opportunities in Africa? |
Shija Kazumba | Water Development Management Institute, Tanzania |
Day 3: Population Growth and the Increasing Demand for Environmental Resources
S12 Assessing the role of soil functions for achieving SDGs.
Conveners: Katharina Helming, Nadia Glaesner (Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research - ZALF), Hans-Jörg Vogel (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ) and Effiom Oku (United Nations University Institute for Natural Resources in Africa - UNU-INRA)
Short description of the session |
Soil functions and services play a decisive role in the interplay between food supply, biodiversity maintenance and environmental health. They include provisioning functions for food and biomass production, raw material, physical and cultural environment for humankind, supporting functions for storing, filtering, transformation, recycling, habitat and gene pool, and cultural functions as archeological sites and cultural identity. Yet, the interactions between soil functions, their spatio-temporal patterns and their impacts on SDGs are not well explored. There is a principle understanding about how soil management affects soil functions, but the next causal step about how exactly soil functions affect SDGs where and when is not understood, not monitored and not assessed. It requires a fully interdisciplinary analytical design integrating soil scientific with social and economic approaches. Suitable indicators need to be identified in order to transfer the complexity of the underlying processes into a format that can be monitored and assessed. Proper and accessible information about the interactions between soil management, soil functions and soil services on SDGs is a prerequisite for Integrated management of environmental resources. |
Objectives and expected outcomes of the session |
The objective of the session is to discuss information requirements and research needs for exploring causal linkages between soil functions, soil services and SDGs, the underlying processes, regional patterns and spillovers. The outcome will be a first attempt to define research questions and to identify indicators, monitoring and data needs for assessing soil function – SDG interrelations. Focus will be on questions that integrate soil science and socio-economic sciences. |
Oral Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Soils and the SDGs: Partners by Default? |
Knut Ehlers |
German Federal Environment Agency |
Linking soil functions to Sustainable Development Goals |
Effiom Oku |
United Nations University Institute for Natural Resources in Africa (UNU-INRA) |
Assessment of soil quality and soil anti-erodibility in different vegetation zone on the Loess Plateau (China) |
Shaoshan An1 and Quanchao Zeng2 |
1Northwest A&F University; 2Institute of soil and water conservation, CAS&MWR |
Improving soil functions for sustainable agriculture- a case study from south India |
E.V.S. Prakasa Rao |
Independent |
Poster Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
The Impact of Soil Function on Agriculture for Sustainable Development Goals |
Adebola Adedugbe |
Farm Ideas Nigeria |
The Soil Dimension of Food Supply Chains affecting SDGs |
Martin Hamer |
Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences |
Impact of land-use change on soil organic carbon stocks and fertility in the Eastern Usambara Mountains, Tanzania |
Maximilian Kirsten1, Carsten Müller2 and Karl-Heinz Feger1 |
1TU Dresden; 2TU Munich |
Advancing Performance Of Green Technologies For Remediation And Reclamation Of Degraded Urban Soils |
Magdalena Sut, Katja Boldt-Burisch, Ina Pohle and Thomas Raab |
Brandenburgische Technische Universität Cottbus-Senftenberg |
S13 Brick production and land degradation. A rural-urban nexus.
Conveners: Zita Sebesvari, Fabrice Renaud (United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security - UNU-EHS), Jens Kruse (University of Bonn) and Mustafizur Rahman (University of Dhaka)
Short description of the session |
The removal of fertile, clay-containing topsoil horizons for brick production is an increasingly serious threat to soil quality/fertility, irrigation water availability, and thus, food security and livelihoods in densely populated and rapidly urbanizing South and Southeast Asia. Topsoil removal is a destructive practice where farmer’s short-term gain stands against the degradation of soil and related ecosystem services, a virtually non-renewable resource of our planet. Next to the impact on soil resources, soil removal impairs irrigation water uses and allocation. Further, high amounts of biomass (mainly firewood and rice straw) are used in brick kilns polluting air and emitting greenhouses gases (GHG). As demand for locally produced, affordable construction material such as for clay is increasing in developing and emerging countries with rapid population growth and infrastructure development, it is likely that soil mining will be further extended in the future. Although the problem has been recognized as widespread in South and Southeast Asia and even become an issue in the media, focused reports, or programs are missing except of a few clean development mechanism (CDM) of the UNFCCC e.g. in Bangladesh (CDM Project 5125) which only tackle one particular part – the GHG emissions - of the whole problem. |
Objectives and expected outcomes of the session |
By bringing together experts, the proposed session will advance our knowledge of the impact of brick production on the social-ecological system in place (e.g. soil, water, GHG emissions, socio-economic structures, regulations) as well as investigate possible solutions such as the replacement of clay by alternative more sustainable materials such as waste (e.g. fly ash and slags) for brick production. Furthermore, we expect that the session will raise awareness for the emerging problems associated with brick production from topsoil considering soil, water, climate as well as socio-economic consequences in the context of urban and industrial development as a driver for resource degradation. The long-term goal is to deliver science based recommendations to avoid further degradation of soil resources by considering options for action and intervention at different (field to international) scales. Further, it should be a forum for the discussion of possible approaches to achieve a land-degradation neutral world as an international sustainability goal. |
Target group |
Scientists and decision makers especially but not exclusively of developing countries as well as individuals and institutions involved in SDG indicator development and monitoring processes |
Oral Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Selling the future? Topsoil removal in South and Southeast Asia |
Zita Sebesvari1, Jens Kruse2, Fabrice Renaud1, Mustafizur Rahman3 and Wulf Amelung2 |
1UNU-EHS; 2University of Bonn; 3University of Dhaka |
Use of Topsoil by Brick Fields threatened for Agricultural Production of Bangladesh. |
Mustafizur Rahman, Foysal Ahmed, Eeusha Nafi and Shakil Uddin Ahmed |
University of Dhaka |
Topsoil selling in Vietnam: current knowledge and examples |
Susanne Weigand1, Jens Kruse1, Zita Sebesvari2, Wulf Amelung1 and Vo Thi Guong3 |
1University of Bonn; 2UNU-EHS; 3Can Tho University |
Analyzing Material Flows of Urbanization – a Basis for the Management of Mining Activities in Ha Noi City and its Hinterland |
Georg Schiller and Peter Wirth |
IOER |
Poster Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Adoption of sustainable land management practices in eastern Africa: case of Tanzania and Malawi |
Oliver Kirui |
University of Bonn |
S14 The Water Quality Dimension of the Water-Soil-Waste Nexus.
Conveners: Sarantuyaa Zandaryaa (International Hydrological Programme UNESCO-IHP), Lucie Pluschke (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - FAO), Fabrice Renaud (United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security - UNU-EHS) and Pay Drechsel, Javier Mateo-Sagasta (International Water Management Institute - IWMI)
Short description of the session |
Clean water is essential for life on Earth. Healthy soil is crucial for natural plant life and food production for the world’s growing population. The interlinkages of these two key elements of the biosphere are through hydrological and geochemical processes that are sometimes altered as a result of human activities (such as inappropriate waste management). . Water quality has become a major concern worldwide due to increasing pollution of surface and groundwater resources especially in developing countries. Soil pollution, agricultural waste runoff, inappropriate solid waste management, reuse of insufficiently or untreated wastewater for irrigation, and open defecation due to lack of sanitation are among the major sources of water pollution. As the world becomes more industrialized, urbanization and lifestyle changes both in developed and developing countries lead to the generation of more solid waste, causing water and soil pollution due to leaching of organic compounds and other pollutants such as heavy metals. In many developing countries, direct dumping of waste into land and water bodies is a common practice. Another major concern for water quality is agricultural waste due to runoff and seepage of nutrient and fertilizers from fields. Soil pollution is also one of growing concerns that we have to deal with, resulting from unsustainable land uses, agriculture activities and inappropriate waste disposal. On the other hand, in developing countries the lack of sanitation and wastewater treatment is also a main source of soil pollution and water pollution by human wastes (excreta). Hence, to protect water quality it is needed to improve wastewater, waste and soil management in a holistic way based on the nexus approach.
|
Objectives and expected outcomes of the session |
The session food production. Towards this end, the session discussions will be centered on focuses on the water quality dimension of the water-soil-waste nexus, by exploring ways and approaches to reduce of impacts of inappropriate waste management and land uses on water quality in view of population growth, land use changes and the need for increasing the following questions: • What are the technological, economical, and policy factors that support a holistic approach to water quality, wastewater and waste management? • How to protect water quality for ecosystems from negative impacts of inadequate (waste) water, waste and soil management? • Water quality in agricultural policies: How to integrate water quality issues in agricultural policies in order to develop agricultural practices that have less impact on soil and water pollution? • Wastewater reuse: What are the main constraints to increase nutrients and water recovery through safe reuse of wastewater for increased food production and agricultural productivity? What are solutions to overcome these constraints? • Capacity development and risk assessment on water quality in agriculture and safe use of wastewater The session will aim to draw key messages from session presentations and discussions towards developing an integrated, holistic approach to water-soil-waste management in order to minimize negative impacts on the quality of world’s freshwater resources. |
Oral Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Opening presentation (10 min) |
||
Improving water quality through an effective implementation of the Water-Soil-Waste nexus |
Sarantuyaa Zandaryaa1 and Fabrice Renaud2 |
1UNESCO-IHP; 2UNU-EHS |
Main presentations (15 min) |
||
Monitoring Agriculture – Water Quality – Food Safety – Health at country level with a nexus approach |
Sara Marjani Zadeh and Lucie Pluschke |
FAO |
How to Manage the Implications of the Water-Soil-Waste Nexus on Freshwater Ecosystems |
Janos J Bogardi1, Fabrice Renaud2 and Zita Sebesvari2 |
1University of Bonn; 2UNU-EHS |
Effect of Palm Oil Mill Effluent on the Microbial Diversity and Nutrient Dynamics in Soil along its Discharge Course |
Geneva Anisiobi1, Olajire Fagbola2, Philip Oviasogie1, Napoleon Aisueni1 and Celestine Ikuenobe1 |
1Nigerian Institute for Oil Palm Research; 2University of Ibadan |
Short case presentations (5 min) and panel discussion |
||
Natural Water Treatment Technologies as a Tool of Sustainable Sanitation and Integrated Water Management |
Miloš Rozkošný1, Eva Mlejnská1, Radim Machů2 and Michal Kriška3 |
1TGM Water Research Institute; 2Centrum Veronica Hostětín; 3Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic |
Assessment of Quality of Harvested Rainwater Stored in Underground Tanks and Their Adjacent Soils in Imo State, Nigeria |
Emmanuella Onyenechere |
Imo State University |
Poster Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
The Sewchar Concept: An Innovative Tool for a Sustainable Water – Waste – Soil Nexus of Sanitation Systems |
Marc Breulmann, Manfred van Afferden, Roland A. Müller and Christoph Fühner |
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) |
Nitrogen compounds and anthropogenic water types in urban groundwater in Yaounde, Cameroon |
Robert Kringel1, Andrea Rechenburg2 and Marie-Antoinette Fomo3 |
1Federal Institute for Geoscience and Natural Ressources (BGR); 2Institute for Hygiene and Public Health (IHPH); 3National Institute for Statistics, Cameroon |
Hydrogeochemical evolution and flow mechanisms of groundwater in Yaounde, Cameroon |
Dorice Kuitcha1, Alain Fouépé1 and Robert Kringel2 |
1Institute for Geological and Mining Research, Cameroon; 2Federal Institute for Geoscience and Natural Ressources |
Effect of bed materials of maturation ponds on solar disinfection |
Moharram Fouad |
Mansoura University, Egypt |
Characterization of Organo-Chlorine Pollutants in a Peri Urban Watershed of Lusaka, Zambia |
Mabvuso Christopher Sinda |
University of Zambia |
Farm-Scale Anaerobic Digestion to Support Sustainable Energy, Water and Nutrient Use: Case Study of a UK Dairy Farm |
Jon Mckechnie, Alexander Lamond and Gavin Walker |
University of Nottingham |
S15 Regional land-use dynamics, water security and the nexus approach.
Conveners: Dietrich Borchardt (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ), Karl-Heinz Feger (TU Dresden) and Thomas Chiramba (United Nations Environment Programme - UNEP)
Short description of the session |
In the light of the global challenges caused by changes in climate and demography and related land-use dynamics the sustainable use and the protection of natural resources are top priorities for sustainable development. Enormous efforts will be necessary to ensure the supply of clean and safe water to the world population and to protect vital terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Major pressures and impacts on water are often driven by food production, energy production, industrial uses and human consumption. |
Oral Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Relative impact of land-use change and climate variability on water yield in the upper Mara River Basin, Kenya |
Hosea Mwangi1, Karl-Heinz Feger1, Stefan Julich1, Gathenya John2 and Bancy Mati2 |
1TU Dresden; 2JKUAT |
Towards an integrated modelling approach to sustainable management of ecosystems and resilience building in Africa: Understanding the nexus across water, energy, forest and land |
Ange-Benjamin Brida1, Alice Bonou2, Byron Bester3, Prudence Lugendo4 and Okoro Sussan5 |
1ENVISCIENCES-Environment & Sciences; 2University of Abomé-Calavi; 3University of Johannesburg; 4Economic and Social Research Forum (ESRF); 5University of Nigeria |
Identifying trade-offs between ecosystem services, land use, and biodiversity under climate change: Combining scenario analysis and optimization to enhance the Nexus approach |
Ralf Seppelt and Martin Volk |
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) |
Multifunctional forestry as nexus approach to minimize the eco-water for regional water security in the dryland regions of China |
Yanhui Wang1, Pengtao Yu1, Wei Xiong1, Karl-Heinz Feger2, Lihong Xu1, Haijun Zuo1 and Kai Schwärzel3 |
1Chinese Academy of Forestry; 2TU Dresden; 3UNU-FLORES |
Impact of land use/cover changes on Morogoro River Catchment in the northern slopes of the Uluguru Mountains, Morogoro, Tanzania |
Didas Kimaro and Proches Hieronimo |
Sokoine University of Agriculture |
The Land-Use Dynamics and Water Nexus for the transboundary Mekong Basin: Potentials and Limitations of Earth Observation |
Claudia Kuenzer1, Patrick Leinenkugel1, Corinne Frey1, Juliane Huth1, Marco Ottinger2, Ursula Gessner1 and Stefan Dech1 |
1German Aerospace Center (DLR); 2University of Wuerzburg |
Poster Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Soil erosion and soil protection in fragile landscapes - A consideration from a geographical perspective |
Daniel Wolf, Philipp Baumgart, Fritz Haubold and Dominik Faust |
TU Dresden |
Infiltration processes in eucalypt and maritime pine stands in Portugal: the role of soil water repellency and preferential flow paths |
Filipa Tavares Wahren1, Joao Pedro Nunes2, Juliana Marisa Santos2, Daniel Hawtree1, Andreas Wahren1, Stefan Julich1, Karl-Heinz Feger1 and Jan Jacob Keizer2 |
1TU Dresden; 2Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies |
Time-Series Analysis of the Long-Term Hydrologic Impacts of Afforestation in the Águeda Watershed of North-Central Portugal |
Daniel Hawtree1, João Pedro Nunes2 and Karl-Heinz Feger1 |
1TU Dresden; 2University of Aveiro |
Socio-economic factors influencing farmers’ adoption of soil and water conservation practices in Morogoro and Ngerengere watersheds, Uluguru Mountains, Tanzania |
Dominico Benedicto Kilemo1, Karl-Heinz Feger1, Stefan Julich1 and Didas N Kimaro2 |
1TU Dresden; 2Sokoine University of Agriculture |
Long-term Analysis of Regional Land-use Dynamics in Nigeria using Remote Sensing Data |
Babatunde A. Osunmadewa, Christine Wessollek and Pierre Karrasch |
TU Dresden |
Managed aquifer recharge (MAR) index for Asia |
Anna-Sophie Strues and Catalin Stefan |
TU Dresden |
Earth observation based analyses of land-use dynamics in West Africa |
Ursula Gessner1, Igor Klein1, Kim Knauer1, Joel Arnault2, Jan Bliefernicht2 and Claudia Kuenzer1 |
1DLR; 2University of Augsburg |
S16 Food Losses and Environmental Resources.
Convener: Lucie Pluschke (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - FAO)
Short description of the session |
This session is an invitation for waste management experts, water footprint analysts and really anyone that is interested in a) how to assess the environmental footprint of food losses and waste (FLW), particularly for water, land, climate and biodiversity, and in b) thinking about possible solutions to prevent, reduce, reuse and recycle FLW. FAO estimates that each year, approximately one-third of all food produced for human consumption in the world is lost or wasted. This food wastage represents a missed opportunity to improve global food security, but also an unnecessary use of environmental resources. Globally, the blue water footprint (i.e. the consumption of surface and groundwater resources) of food wastage is about 250 km3, which is equivalent to the annual water discharge of the Volga River, or three times the volume of Lake Geneva. Produced but uneaten food vainly occupies almost 1.4 billion hectares of land or close to 30 percent of the world’s agricultural land area. Intensive farming practices, without allowing fields to lie fallow and replenish, contribute to soil degradation and putting unnecessary pressure on soil resources. In avoiding food wastage, there is actually more that would be gained by its reduction than a mere reduction in its ‘footprint’. Generally, less wastage is associated with more efficiency and eventually more effective recycling of resources and less transport and storage needs across long distances - all leading to savings in natural capital, less resource use and lower GHG emissions. |
Objectives and expected outcomes of the session |
The aim of this session is to inform about different ways of assessing the environmental footprint of food losses and waste, particularly for water, land, climate and biodiversity. With this in mind, we will discuss different solutions for preventing and managing FLW. At the end of the session, the speakers will present a joint call for action to examine more closely a) the link between FLW and environmental resources management, and b) the different impacts and ways of dealing with FLW by disadvantaged groups. |
Target group |
The session - and the call for action – appeals to broad range of actors. Researchers, media, advocacy groups, implementing agencies as well as policy-makers and donors are invited to discuss with us and make suggestions on how to move forward. |
Oral Presentations |
|||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
|
Opening |
|||
Welcome and short film |
Lucie Pluschke |
FAO |
|
Joint Call for Action |
By all partners |
||
Introduction to the topic of food waste and losses (FLW) and the link to environmental resources
|
Emilie Wieben |
FAO |
|
Assessing causes, impacts and solutions of FLW |
|||
Food use throughout the supply chain: European monitoring framework and environmental impact assessment |
Hilke Bos-Brouwers, Karin Östergren and Silvia Scherhaufer |
FUSIONS |
|
How to identify and reduce food loss and waste in a nexus thinking: The biomass‐based value web as a novel perspective |
Detlef Virchow1, Tina Beuchelt1, Arnim Kuhn2 and Manfred Denich1 |
1Center for Development Research - ZEF; 2Institute for Food and Resource Economics - ILR |
|
Solutions to FLW: prevent, reduce, reuse, recycle |
|||
Think.Eat.Save Food Waste Prevention Programmes |
Clementine O'Connor |
UNEP |
S17 Promoting safe and sustainable wastewater use in agriculture – formal and informal approaches.
Conveners: Pay Drechsel (International Water Management Institute - IWMI), Sarantuyaa Zandaryaa (International Hydrological Programme UNESCO-IHP), Manzoor Qadir (United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health - UNU-INWEH) and Kai Schwärzel (UNU-FLORES)
Short description of the session |
In all urbanizing parts of Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), there is an increasing demand for soil fertilizers and sufficient water to serve the rapid population growth in the region with sufficient food. A much related challenge of population growth is how to deal with the ever increasing volumes of food waste and wastewater in light of ineffective wastewater management which covers only a small portion of the total wastewater volume generated. Because of the high costs of conventional technical wastewater treatment facilities, only the wealthiest countries can treat most of their wastewater. The largest part of SSA’s wastewater is disposed to water bodies and the environment untreated or with a very low level of treatment. As using wastewater as a resource in food production may overcome some of the challenges farmers face, wastewater is used where available, but even more indirectly where it pollutes other water bodies used in irrigation. This informal irrigation sector along streams and rivers is usually unregulated and unmonitored, and a typical example of the Nexus where water, soil and waste meets. In Ghana, IWMI estimated about 40,000 ha of informal peri-urban irrigation, which is about six times the area supported by Ghana’s 22 public irrigation schemes. Beyond this, however, there are no data on this important sector across SSA which will make it a significant challenge to monitor wastewater reuse, also in light of the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Another challenge is the potential health risk associated with the direct and indirect use of wastewater. While authorities see the risks but lack capacity to engage with the informal sector, consumers have little information on the water used to irrigate the food they buy, and farmers see more their benefits while often being unaware of possible risks especially where wastewater is only indirectly used. This session will focus on formal and informal waste water irrigation on the example of SSA, with specific focus on what options authorities have to address the sector’s challenges and ultimately are able to generate data on its size and help monitoring indicators on the safe and sustainable use of wastewater for irrigation, for example in the context of the proposed SDG goals and targets in the post-2015 development agenda framework. |
Objectives and expected outcomes of the session |
Questions to be addressed 1. How to assess the size of the informal and indirect wastewater reuse sector in SSA which is dimensions larger than the one under formal and/or direct reuse? 2. How to support a trajectory from unsafe to safe wastewater use in a situation where conventional wastewater treatment is only a long-term option? 3. How valid are the WHO 2006 Guidelines which were designed for this kind of situation, and are there alternatives? 4. How feasible would it be to set water quality/waste water reuse standards for different reuse options and cropping systems? 5. What are possible indicators for wastewater management and reuse that can be simple used to collect data from various stakeholders, taking into consideration a proposed SDG target on wastewater treatment and reuse?
Expected Outcome 1. Awareness created on an important Nexus example located in the informal sector. 2. Identification of barriers and opportunities for improving safety within the Nexus. 3. Identification of data gaps for assessing the Nexus and options to address them.
|
Oral Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Setting the Scene: Status of Wastewater Treatment and Potential for Irrigation |
Manzoor Qadir1 and Javier Mateo-Sagasta2 |
1UNU-INWEH; 2IWMI |
Wastewater Reuse: Options and Approaches to Transitioning from Unsafe Reuse to Safe Reuse |
Sarantuyaa Zandaryaa |
UNESCO-IHP |
Potential health risks from water and soil contamination and indirect use of wastewater in the Nakuvibo wetland swamp in Kampala, Uganda |
Samuel Fuhrimann1, Cissé Guéladio1, Mirko Winkler1 and Medlicott Kate2 |
1University of Basel; 2World Health Organization |
“If opportunity doesn't knock, build a door”: The trajectory of a successful story of formal use of treated effluent in Western Cape Province, South Africa |
Cecilia Saldias, Stijn Speelman and Guido Van Huylenbroeck |
Ghent University |
Options for producing treated wastewater for agricultural applications: The Mauritius case study |
Vikram Seebaluck1, Solomon Gebrechorkos2, Mari Ito2 and Hiroshan Hettiarachchi2 | 1University of Mauritius, 2UNU-FLORES |
Poster Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Assessment of Constructed Wetlands for the Treatment of Wastewater for Peri-Urban Irrigation in Kenya and Mozambique |
Bancy Mati1, António Cumbane2 and Mari Ito3 |
1Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology; 2Eduardo Mondlane Univerisity; 3UNU-FLORES |
Application of Bioaugumentation for safe and sustainable reuse of wastewater: case studies in Namibia and Ethiopia |
Elsabe Julies1, Araya Alemie Berhe2, Mahesh Jampani3, Solomon Gebrechorkos3, Mari Ito3 and Hiroshan Hettiarachchi3 |
1University of Namibia; 2Mekelle University; 3UNU-FLORES |
Healing industrial sickwater for agricultural use: the potential of an African grass species |
Effiom Oku |
UNU-INRA |
Nexus approach in urban-agricultural system; a study of a small island |
Indra Firmansyah, Marc Spiller, A.L Smit, Gerrit-Jan Carsjens and Grietje Zeeman |
Wageningen University |
Local solutions to multiple water and agriculture problems in rural community in Armenia |
Arevik Hovsepyan1, Eduard Mesropyan2 and Zaruhi Khachatryan1 |
1Country Water Partnership NGO; 2JINJ LTD |
S18 The potentials of integrated land use planning and ecosystem services to enhance the sustainable provision of natural resources.
Conveners: Christine Fürst (Center for Development Research - ZEF) and Christina von Haaren, Christian Albert (University of Hannover)
Short description of the session |
The sustainable provision of natural resources is one of the most challenging responsibilities of land use planning, particularly regarding intra- and intergenerational equity. Here, highly integrative assessment and planning concepts are requested that support building shared knowledge bases and favor landscape scale answers on growing demands in resources rather than micro-scale solutions. The concept of ecosystem services provides an internationally acknowledged boundary concept for building consensus on different value systems and helping to test trade-offs even for prospective requests in natural resources. There is a broad agreement that the potential of (agricultural) land management practices to contribute to the provision of a multitude of ecosystem services is not well included in spatial planning. Making use of the concept in planning provides an opportunity to better account for the impacts of agricultural management in regional contexts and test trade-offs of scenarios of an increased biomass production. The application of the concept helps to make improved use of knowledge on natural potentials and risks for ecosystem services provision without consuming land. Especially regions with limited capacities to feed growing needs in natural resources provision due to above-average population growth, land scarcity, or otherwise disfavorable environmental conditions would profit from improved knowledge integration. |
Objectives and expected outcomes of the session |
In the symposium, we aim at contributions that address to potentials of the ecosystem services concept in integrated land use planning towards the application of a nexus approach in land, soil and water management. Based upon case studies, we will discuss implications for actor involvement, organization of the planning process and later decision making. We will revise the readiness of governance schemes, restrictions coming from the data environment, institutional responsibilities and actor related criteria for a successful implementation of the ecosystem services concept in land use planning. |
Target group |
Scientists and stakeholders involved in spatial planning and regional development |
Oral Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Integrated modelling, mapping and assessment of ecosystem services – challenges and approaches |
Christine Fürst1, Susanne Frank2, Katrin Pietzsch3 and Frank Pietzsch3 |
1Bonn University; 2Center for Development Research (ZEF); 3PiSolution.de |
Integrated land use strategic planning of peripheral region. Case study from Czech-Polish borderland labor market |
Marcin Spyra1, Jan Bondaruk2 and Anna Pilch2 |
1Opole University of Technology; 2Central Mining Institute |
How combining land use change simulation and ecosystem services assessment can support integrated land use planning |
Susanne Frank1, Christine Fürst1 and Frank Pietzsch2 |
1Center for Development Research (ZEF); 2PiSoluntion GmbH |
A Case for Landscape Planning and Governance: Balancing Trade-Offs between Bioenergy and other Ecosystem Services |
Christian Albert, Johannes Hermes, Felix Neuendorf, Carolin Galler, Michael Rode and Christina von Haaren |
Leibniz Univeristaet Hannover |
Experiences from Payments for Ecosystem Services for reducing Deforestation and Forest Degradation |
Gerald Kapp1 and Leonel Iglesias2 |
1TU-Dresden; 2The World Bank |
Participatory impact assessment of improved Food Value Chains: the case of semi-arid Dodoma region in Tanzania |
Hannes König1, Jana Schindler1, Laurent Kaburire2, Devotah Mchau3, Frieder Graef1, Khamaldin Mutabazi4, Henry Mahoo4 and Stefan Sieber1 |
1Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF); 2Mtandao wa Vikundi vya W akulima Tanzania (MVIWATA); 3Agriculture Research Institute (ARI); 4Sokoine University of Agriculture |
Expert-based assessment of land use scenarios in northern Ghana |
Janina Kleemann, Christine Fürst, Gülendam Baysal, Hongmi Koo and Justice Inkoom |
Center for Development Research (ZEF) |
A stakeholder-based approach for assessing agricultural land use scenarios on Ecosystem services in Northern Ghana |
Hongmi Koo and Christine Fürst |
Center for Development Research (ZEF) |
Poster Presentations |
||
Title |
Authors |
Affiliation |
Temporal dynamics of biomass products provision at the landscape scale |
Marcos Jiménez Martínez1 and Christine Fürst2 | 1Bonn University; 2Center for Development Research (ZEF) |
Subterranean Spatial Planning - Sustainable Solutions to Conflicting Use in the Subsurface: Challenges and Opportunities |
Sebastian Bartel and Gerold Janssen | IOER |
Evaluation of the Impact of Payments for Reforestation in the Mexican State Michoacán |
Elsa Maria Cardona Santos, Karin Holm-Müller and Daniel Kyalo Willy | University of Bonn |
Indicators of Hemeroby for Land Use Monitoring in Germany |
Christian Stein and Ulrich Walz | IOER |
* Leading Conveners are underlined